JUDGMENT

Rekha Borana, J. - All the writ petitions involve common question of facts and law and hence are decided by this common order.

2. The present writ petitions have been filed on behalf of the petitioners with a prayer to be appointed on the post of Prabodhak.

3. The present writ petitions relate to the recruitment process of the year 2008. At the relevant point of time the petitioners were not considered for appointment on the basis that the petitioners had not acquired the eligible qualification as their supplementary result was declared after the last date prescribed for determination of eligibility. Aggrieved against the said action, different writ petitions were preferred and the same were disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to file representation to the respondent authorities and the department was directed to consider the same in accordance with law. It is averred that the representations in pursuance to the said order were filed to the respondent-department which were rejected somewhere in the month of December 2010.

4. The present writ petitions have been filed in the year 2018/2021 with the submission that a similarly situated employee Smt. Rashi Chundawat w