SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2199

DINESH MEHTA
Ghanshyam – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
D.L.R. Vyas, Advocate, for the Appellant
Mohd. Javed Gauri, P.P, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Mehta, J. - By way of present petition, petitioner has challenged the order dated 23.02.2022 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate No. 3, Jodhpur Metropolitan (hereinafter referred to as 'the trial Court') whereby petitioner's application filed under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Code') for summoning call details of SHO - Parmeshwari, Constables - Akbar, Pemaram, Madaram and Ashok has been rejected.

2. The facts narrated briefly are that the petitioner instituted a complaint alleging that the concerned SHO has falsely implicated the petitioner in a case under Section 8/15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1985') on the basis of false recovery.

3. In the complaint so filed, when the statements under Sections 200 & 202 of the Code had been recorded, the petitioner moved an application on 18.11.2021 under Section 91 of the Code and requested the trial Court to summon call details of the above referred officials of the concerned police station.

4. The trial Court rejected petitioner's application inter alia observing that the petitioner can move su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top