RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Parveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Judgment
Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, J.
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of order dated 06.02.2023 (Annexure P-4), passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar in FIR No.61 dated 04.03.2022 registered under Sections 20 (C) & 61 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, at Police Station Bass, District Hisar, whereby the application under Section 91 Cr.P.C. for preserving the call detail record given in the application, has been dismissed; along with certain other prayers.
2. Perusal of the record shows that the petitioner had tried to get the call detail record of the police official, who is cited as witness of recovery from the petitioner. The assumption of the petitioner is that the police official might be having his mobile phone with him at the relevant time when the petitioner was arrested. If the call details regarding that mobile phone are brought on record then the fact can be proved by the petitioner in defence that he was not arrested with the co-accused, rather, he was arrested from a different place.
3. In considered view of this court; just to give credence to the assumption of the petitioner th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.