SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1592

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Parveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Parties : Mr. Raman Chawla

Judgment

Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, J.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of order dated 06.02.2023 (Annexure P-4), passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar in FIR No.61 dated 04.03.2022 registered under Sections 20 (C) & 61 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, at Police Station Bass, District Hisar, whereby the application under Section 91 Cr.P.C. for preserving the call detail record given in the application, has been dismissed; along with certain other prayers.

2. Perusal of the record shows that the petitioner had tried to get the call detail record of the police official, who is cited as witness of recovery from the petitioner. The assumption of the petitioner is that the police official might be having his mobile phone with him at the relevant time when the petitioner was arrested. If the call details regarding that mobile phone are brought on record then the fact can be proved by the petitioner in defence that he was not arrested with the co-accused, rather, he was arrested from a different place.

3. In considered view of this court; just to give credence to the assumption of the petitioner th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top