Mangi Lal vs State - 2022 Supreme(Raj) 1673

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1673

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Mangi Lal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Rajeev Bishnoi, Advocate, for the Appellant
Abhishek Purohit, AGA, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - This criminal appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C. has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:

"It is, therefore, prayed that this appeal be accepted, the convictions and the sentences of the appellants be quashed and they be acquitted of the charges or any other appropriate order which may be considered just and proper in the circumstances of the case may be passed. "

2. The matter pertains to an incident which occurred in the year 1988 and the present appeal has been pending since the year 1994.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that this Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 12.05.1994 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No. 1, Chittorgarh in Sessions Case 131/88 whereby the appellant was convicted for the offences under Sections 147, 323/149 & 304-II/149 of IPC and sentenced to undergo one years' R.I.; sentenced to undergo six months' R.I. & sentenced to undergo four years' R.I. respectively.

4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the incident is of 06.11.1988, in which, the dispute arose regarding the ownership of a particular agricultural land between the parti