Ajmer Singh @ Balu vs State - 2022 Supreme(Raj) 1478

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1478

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Ajmer Singh @ Balu – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vinod Sharma, for the Appellant
Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:

"It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this appeal may kindly be allowed and impugned judgment of conviction and sentence dated 08.12.2014 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Pali in Sessions case no.54/2022 (11/2009) may kindly be quashed and set aside and the appellants may kindly be acquitted from the charges levelled against them."

2. The appellant No.2 Bitthu has expired.

3. The appellants No.1, 3 & 4 i.e. Ajmer Singh @ Balu, Rockey and Chand @ Rafi @ Yusuf have already served sentence of six years and nineteen days (as on 24.03.2015) in lieu of seven years' sentence awarded to them.

4. The matter pertains to an incident which occurred in the year 2008 and the present appeal has been pending since the year 2014.

5. Counsel for the appellant(s) submits that this Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 08.12.2014, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Pali in Sessions Case no.54/2011 (11/2009), whereby the learned court below while acquitting appellants under Sections 325, 342, 457 read with 34 IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act, convicted them

Click Here to Read the rest of this document