PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Mangi Lal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
"It is, therefore, prayed that the appeal may kindly be allowed and the appellant be acquitted and the sentence passed against the appellant be set aside. In the alternative it is also prayed that if the Hon'ble Court finds the appellant guilty of the offence, then the case does not travel beyond Section 308 IPC and in that condition the appellant may kindly be granted benefit of probation of Offenders Act."
2. The matter pertains to an incident which occurred in the year 1992 and the present appeal is pending since 1994.
3. This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 29.07.1994 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Chittorgarh in Sessions Case No.23/93 whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to undergo two years' R.I. with a fine of Rs.500/-, in default of fine, to further undergo three months R.I.
4. Counsel for the appellant submits that its a case of solitary injury. There was no intention to cause murder or fatal injury. No blood-stains were found on the knife nor at the place of oc
Alister Anthony Pareira Vs. State of Maharashtra (2012) 2 SCC 648
The court must consider the principles of deterrence and correction in sentencing, as well as the gravity of the crime, motive for the crime, and all other attendant circumstances.
The court emphasized the consideration of the gravity of the crime, motive for the crime, and all other attendant circumstances in determining the appropriate sentence.
The court applied the principles of deterrence and correction in sentencing policy to reduce the appellants' sentence to the period already undergone.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's application of sentencing principles, considering the gravity of the crime, motive for the crime, nature of the offence, and other atte....
The court has the discretion to consider the time already spent in custody and may reduce the sentence accordingly.
The court considered the gravity of the crime, motive for the crime, nature of the offence, and all other attendant circumstances in determining the appropriate sentence for the appellants.
The court applied the principles of sentencing policy and the need for timely treatment of injuries in determining the appropriate sentence for the appellant.
The court's decision was influenced by the sentencing principles, considering the crucial witness turning hostile and the non-recovery of the weapon of the crime, leading to the reduction of the appe....
The court must consider the gravity of the crime, motive for the crime, nature of the offence, and all other attendant circumstances in determining the appropriate sentence.
The court applied the principles of sentencing, considering the gravity of the crime, motive for the crime, and the nature of the offence, to decide on the reduction of sentence for appellant No.2-Ma....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.