JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - This anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No. 05/2022, Police Station Mahila Thana, district Bikaner for the offences under Sections 498-A, 406 and 323 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant and no specific averment has been made in the complaint as well as in the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. It is argued that the complainant has alleged that she received injuries on her back whereas, no injury report was prepared at the relevant time. He further submits that specific allegation has been levelled against the husband and similarly situated co-accused i.e. sister-in-law of the complainant has already been granted bail by this Court. It is also argued that both the petitioners are in their old age and not keeping good health, therefore, the petitioners maybe enlarged on anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance on the order of Delhi High Court in the case of K. Surajit Kaur Chopra v. N.C.T. of Delhi, order of Andhra Pradesh High Court i