SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1093

RAMESHWAR VYAS
Rohit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.R. Godara and Pankaj Kumar Gupta, Advocates, for the Appellant
Sumer Singh Rajpurohit, Dy. G.C, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

Rameshwar Vyas, J. - S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4733/2022

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 110/2022 registered at Police Station Suratgarh City, District Sriganganagar for the offence under Section 3/25 of Arms Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offence alleged against the petitioner under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, 1959 is punishable with imprisonment for seven years. The petitioner is not a previously convict. He further submits that the petitioner is behind the bar since 08.03.2022. The investigation has been completed and the trial of the case may take sufficient long time to complete. On the above grounds, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

4. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the rival contentions of the parties and upon a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, without co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top