SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1093

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Rameshwar Vyas, J.
Rohit Kumar & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 4733 and 6229/2022
Decided On : 20-05-2022

Advocates appeared:
S.R. Godara and Pankaj Kumar Gupta, Advocates, for the Appellant
Sumer Singh Rajpurohit, Dy. G.C, for the Respondents

The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to grant bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. based on the facts and circumstances of the case.

Headnote:

Arms Act - Bail Application - The court allowed the bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for the accused-petitioners who were in custody in connection with offences under the Arms Act, 1959.

Fact of the Case:

The bail applications were filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners who were in custody in connection with offences under the Arms Act, 1959.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without commenting upon the merits of the case, found that the bail applications deserved to be accepted and ordered the release of the accused-petitioners on bail.

Issues: The issues involved the consideration of the bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for the accused-petitioners in custody for offences under the Arms Act, 1959.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the rival contentions of the parties in reaching the decision to allow the bail applications.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. and ordered the release of the accused-petitioners on bail.

JUDGMENT

Rameshwar Vyas, J. - S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4733/2022

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 110/2022 registered at Police Station Suratgarh City, District Sriganganagar for the offence under Section 3/25 of Arms Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offence alleged against the petitioner under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act, 1959 is punishable with imprisonment for seven years. The petitioner is not a previously convict. He further submits that the petitioner is behind the bar since 08.03.2022. The investigation has been completed and the trial of the case may take sufficient long time to complete. On the above grounds, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

4. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the rival contentions of the parties and upon a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

6. Consequently, the present bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner -Rohit Kumar @ Rohitash S/o. Hariram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 110/2022 registered at Police Station Suratgarh City, District Sriganganagar shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6229/2022

7. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 110/2022 registered at Police Station Suratgarh City, District Sriganganagar for the offence under Section 5/25 of Arms Act.

8. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

9. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that offence alleged against the petitioner under Section 5/25 of the Arms Act, 1959 is punishable with imprisonment for seven years. The petitioner is not a previous convict. He further submits that the petitioner is behind the bar since 11.03.2022. The investigation has been completed and the trial of the case may take sufficient long time to complete. On the above grounds, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

10. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

11. Having regard to the rival contentions of the parties and upon a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

12. Consequently, the present bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner -Sonu @ Swaran Singh S/o. Gurucharan arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 110/2022 registered at Police Station Suratgarh City, District Sriganganagar shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top