SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1100

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Rameshwar Vyas, J.
Omprakash – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5885 of 2022
Decided On : 19-05-2022

Advocates appeared:
Sanjay Mathur, Advocate, Sumer Singh Rajpurohit, Advocate

Headnote:

Bail Application - Offence under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption (amendment) act, 2018 - The court allowed the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. without commenting upon the merits of the case.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for the offence under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption (amendment) act, 2018. The petitioner had been in custody for over a month, and false allegations were made against him.

Finding of the Court:

The court, without commenting upon the merits of the case, found that the bail application deserves to be accepted and allowed the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

Issues: The main issue was whether the accused-petitioner should be granted bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for the offence under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption (amendment) act, 2018.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the submissions made by the parties and decided to grant bail to the accused-petitioner without commenting upon the merits of the case.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. and ordered the release of the accused-petitioner upon furnishing a personal bond and surety bonds.

JUDGMENT

Rameshwar Vyas, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 134/2022 registered at Police Station C.P.S. a.C.B. Jaipur (Chowki Bikaner) for the offence under Section 7 of Prevention of Corruption (amendment) act, 2018.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is behind the bar for last more than one month. The petitioner is a private person, against whom false allegations have been made. On the above grounds, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

4. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and upon a consideration of the facts, without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

6. Consequently, the present bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Omprakash S/o Sahiram Taran arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 134/2022 registered at Police Station C.P.S. a.C.B. Jaipur (Chowki Bikaner) shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top