VIJAY BISHNOI
Hariram – Appellant
Versus
Moru Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This writ petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved with the order dated 07.03.2022 passed by the Additional District Judge No.1, Barmer (hereinafter to be referred as 'the appellate court') whereby, the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. The said appeal was preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 07.09.2021 passed by the Additional Civil Judge No.1, Barmer (hereinafter to be referred as 'the trial court') on an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC whereby, the parties were directed to maintain status quo till the pendency of the suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent-plaintiff has filed a suit before the trial court seeking permanent injunction claiming that a piece of land was purchased by her father-in-law and later on the same was transferred in her name, but the petitioner-defendant is trying to encroach over the said piece of land, therefore, he may be restrained from interfering in the peaceful possession of the respondent-plaintiff by way of issuing permanent injunction.
3. Along with the said
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.