SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 982

SUDESH BANSAL
Nanga – Appellant
Versus
Ramchandra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Zeeshan Khan, for the Appellant.

ORDER

1. Appellants-plaintiffs have filed this second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, assailing judgment and decree dated 15.12.2016 passed by District Judge, Bundi in appeal No.40/2011, affirming the judgment and decree dated 23.08.2011 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division), Lakheri, Bundi in Civil Suit No.33/94 whereby appellants-plaintiffs' suit for permanent and mandatory injunction in relation to land alleged to be of public chowk and public way has been dismissed on merits.

2. Heard counsel for appellants and perused the record.

3. It appears from record that appellants-plaintiffs instituted a simpliciter suit for permanent injunction alleging inter alia that suit property described in para 1 of the plaint marked as ?.?.?.? in the map situated at Kasba Nayapura, Lakheri, District Bundi is a public chowk and its part marked ?.??.?.? has been encroached upon by respondents- private defendants. Hence, prayer was made to the following effect:-

4. On the basis of pleadings and evidence on record, both Court have recorded fact findings that plaintiffs could not prove by oral or documentary evidence that the suit property marked as ?.?.?.? is a land of publi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top