SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1229

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Akash Samant – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Dharmendra Surana, Advocate, Dilip Choudhary, Advocate, Anil Joshi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - This Court has perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.134/2022 of Police Station Mahamandir, Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 307 IPC. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the bail application qua petitioners No.1 akash Samant & No.3 Bhavesh Sen as against petitioner No.1 there is attribution of causing knife injury and petitioner No.3 Bhavesh has criminal antecedents.

4. Hence, the bail application qua petitioners No.1 & 3 is dismissed as not pressed.

5. So far as petitioner No.2 Rakesh @ Lawrance is concerned, counsel submits that his case is at par with co-accused Jitendra Singh, who has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.05.2022 in SB Cr. Misc. Bail application No.6834/2022. Therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner No.2 may be released on bail.

6. Learned additional advocate General has opposed the bail application.

7. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that conclusion of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top