SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1294

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Padam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Vikram Singh, Advocate, Mahipal Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dr Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - This Court perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.295/2021 of Police Station Dechu, District Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366-a, 376-D, 342, 506 of IPC and Section 5(G)/6 of POCSO act, 2012. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out the conclusion in the charge-sheet arrived at by the investigating officer, in which, the main allegation is upon Prithviraj Singh, who alleged to have committed rape. Learned counsel further submits that the allegation upon Padam Singh and one Manohar Singh is that Padam Singh dropped the petitioner and the prosecutrix in his car to Jodhpur and went back and Manohar Singh helped them for booking a room.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top