SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1035

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Pradeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Manoj Chotia, Advocate, Vikram Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - This Court perused the material available on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 195/2022 of Police Station, Nohar, District Hanumangarh for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(N), 354, 354(GHA), 323, 366-A, 384, 34 IPC and Section 5-L/6 of POCSO Act, 2012. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. The incident as alleged in FIR started about three year’s ago and then 6 to 7 months got slightly aggravated. Thereafter, the statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C., also re-affirm the same. They new each other for the last three years.

4. Learned PP opposed the application.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

6. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Pradeep Kumar S/o Nandlal shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 195/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top