SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1311

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Vinod Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Kuldeep Sharma, Advocate, S.S.Rajpurohit, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned learned public prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

2. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14a (2) Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities) act on behalf of the appellants, who are in custody in connection with FIR No.100/2022, Police Station Sangaria, Distt. Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 459, 341, 323, 326 & 34 of IPC and Section 3(1)(S) & 3(2)(V) of SC/ST act, against the order dated 26.04.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) Cases, Hanumangarh in Criminal Misc. Case No.68/2022 (CIS No.67/2022) whereby, the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellants under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was rejected.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have not committed the offences as alleged against them and they are innocent. The appellants are in judicial custody and trial of the case will take a sufficient long time. In these circumstances, the appellants may be released on bail.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the enti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top