SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 933

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rajendra Choudhary, Advocate, Anita Gehlot, Advocate, Kuldeep Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned learned public prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant. Perused the material available on record.

2. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14a (2) Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities) act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.184/2020, P.S. arakshi Kendra Sangaria, Distt. Hanumangarh for the offences under Sections 302/34-201 of IPC and Section 3(1)(S)(2)(Va) of SC/ST act, against the order dated 03.02.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) Cases, Hanumangarh in Criminal Misc. Case No.19/2022 (CIS No.19/2022) whereby, the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was rejected.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that co-accused Manoj Kumar has already been granted bail by coordinate Bench of this Court and case of the appellant is similar to that of the co-accused. It is also submitted that the complainant-Indra Devi has been examined in the trial court as PW-1 and she has not named the present appellant. The appellant is in judi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top