PANKAJ BHANDARI, ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Maya Verma – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 08.03.2022 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jaipur Bench-Jaipur (for short 'the Tribunal').
2. The petitioner submitted Original Application before the Tribunal with the following prayer:-
"(i) the respondents may be directed to treat the regular service of the applicant from her date of initial appointment i.e 16.06.1981 or from the date of first D.P.C. i.e 27.08.1982 or from the date of second D.P.C held in the year 1985 and counting qualifying service for the purpose of granting A.C.P and M.A.C.P. and further for the purpose of all consequential benefits including pension and gratuity.
(ii) The respondents may be directed to re-fix the pay of the applicant in the pay scale given to the other Lab. Technicians working in the other central Government departments including C.G.H.S as recommended by 5th and 6th pay commission report and accepted by the Central Government. All consequential benefits including arrear of pay and allowances may also be allowed to the applicant.
(iii) Grant such other and further reliefs which are expedient in favour of the applicant.
(iv) Cost of the OA may be a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.