SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 936

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Pratapi Bai – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ram Singh Rawal, Advocate, Anees Bhurat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioners has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 180/2021 of Police Station Kurabad, District Udaipur, for the offence punishable under Sections 306, 323, 341 & 34 of IPC.

2. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no evidence against the petitioners for abatement to commit suicide and the challan of the case has already been presented. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed these bail applications.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

6. accordingly, these bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Pratapi Bai W/o Gaurishankar Ji, (2) Kalu @ Kallu S/o Ganesh Lal, (3) Raju S/o Ganesh Lal and (4) Shanti Lal S/o Gorish

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top