MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Pratapi Bai – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioners has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 180/2021 of Police Station Kurabad, District Udaipur, for the offence punishable under Sections 306, 323, 341 & 34 of IPC.
2. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no evidence against the petitioners for abatement to commit suicide and the challan of the case has already been presented. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed these bail applications.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
6. accordingly, these bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Pratapi Bai W/o Gaurishankar Ji, (2) Kalu @ Kallu S/o Ganesh Lal, (3) Raju S/o Ganesh Lal and (4) Shanti Lal S/o Gorish
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.