SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 890

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Chelaram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Kalu Ram Bhati, Advocate, B.R. Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The instant application for temporary suspension of sentences under Section 389 CrPC has been preferred on behalf of the appellant-applicant Chelaram S/o Shri Khumaram who has been convicted and sentenced for the offences under Sections 302/149, 148, 341, 323, 324/149 and 427 IPC vide the judgment dated 21.08.2020 passed by the learned additional Sessions Judge, Bhinmal, District Jalore in Sessions Case No.34/2014 on the ground of marriage of his son Dinesh Kumar which is going to be solemnized on 10.05.2022.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted a verification report of the SHO Police Station Sarwana, District Jalore wherein the factum of wedding of the petitioner's son Dinesh Kumar with Ms. Ramila Kumari has been verified. as the factum of marriage of the appellant's son on 10.05.2022 has been verified and since presence of the appellant/applicant in the family to perform the customary rites and rituals is essential, we are inclined to accept the instant application for temporary suspension of sentences.

3. accordingly, the instant application for temporary suspension of sentences is allowed. The sentences awarded to appellant-applicant Chelaram S/o Shri Khumaram by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top