ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Manju Devi – Appellant
Versus
Saleem – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Instant appeal has been preferred by the claimants- appellants against the judgment and award dated 29.06.2017 passed by the Court of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Laxmangarh, Alwar (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') in Motor Claim Case No.111/2016 whereby an amount of 43,71,560/- was awarded as compensation on account of death of Daya Ram in the accident occurred on 22.03.2016.
2. Learned Tribunal after framing the issues and evaluating the evidence on record and after hearing counsel for the parties, decided the claim petition of the claimants-appellants and awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.43,71,560/- under various heads in favour of the claimants-appellants.
3. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the deceased Daya Ram was working on the post of Teacher at Government Primary School, Village Jakhopur, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar and at the time of his death, his age was 43 years 8 months and 10 days and his monthly salary was Rs.43,510/-. Counsel further submitted that in order to prove the income of the deceased, salary certificate
Concord of India Insurance Co. vs. Nirmaladevi and Ors.
N. Sivammal & Ors. vs. Managing Director
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi reported in AIR 2017 SC 5157
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Charlie & Anr [(2005) 10 SCC 720]
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Kalpana (Smt.) & Ors. [(2007) 3 SCC 538]
Rathi Menon vs. Union of India [(2001) 3 SCC 714]
Sarla Verma (Smt.) and others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr.
Sunil Sharma & Ors. vs. Bachitar Singh & Ors. reported in 2011 (2) KLT 451
T.N. State Transport Corporation Ltd. vs. S. Rajapriya & Ors. [(2005) 6 SCC 236]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.