ACHAL KUMAR PALIWAL
Gayatri Devi W/o Chetan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Roop Narayan S/o Badrilal Sahu – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This common order shall govern disposal of both M.A. No. 2354/2013 and M.A. No. 2278/2013 as both appeals arise out common award dated 13.08.2013.
2. These appeals by the appellants/claimants (M.A. No. 2354/2013) and Insurance Company (M.A. No. 2278/2013) under section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act are arising out of the award dated 13.08.2013 passed by Member, MACT, Dewas district Dewas in Claim Case No. 248/2009 seeking enhancement/reduction of compensation amount awarded by the Tribunal.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant/claimants has submitted that Tribunal has assessed deceased’s income on the lower side. Deceased was appointed on a monthly salary of Rs. 14,603/-. Hence, his monthly income should be determined as Rs. 14,603/- per month. Further, annual bonus of Rs. 55,000/- be also added in the income.
4. Learned counsel for the Insurance Company has submitted that Tribunal has assessed deceased’s income on the higher side. As per deposition of PW-2 Anil Sharma and salary slip Ex.P/17, Deceased’s basic salary was Rs. 8190/- per month. Learned counsel for the I
Asha and Others vs. United Indian Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Gopali
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Kalpana and Others
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. Charlie and Another
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Indira Srivastava and Others
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Indira Srivastava and Others
Sarla Verma and Others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.