Durg Singh vs State Of Rajasthan - 2022 Supreme(Raj) 2226

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2226

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Durg Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Vineet Jain, Advocate, Rajeev Bishnoi, Advocate, B.R. Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The instant application for suspension of sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by appellants-applicants who have been convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 11.03.2022 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur in Sessions Case No.120/2013:

Offence Under Section	Imprisonment	Fine	Sentence in default of fine
302 IPC	Life Imprisonment	Rs.20,000/-	2 Months' SI
201 R.W.S 34 IPC	5 Years' SI	Rs.5,000/-	1 Month's SI
Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Learned Public Prosecutor has filed reply to the application for suspension of sentences.

3. We have heard and considered the submissions advanced by Shri Jain, learned senior counsel, assisted by Shri Rajeev Bishnoi, representing the appellants and learned Public Prosecutor and have gone through the impugned judgment.

4. The prosecution case emanates from the written report dated 17.04.2013 submitted by complainant Ladu Ram (PW.11) alleging inter alia that his nephew Kishore Singh went away from his home on the night of 13.04.2013 after receivin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2226

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANIDurg Singh – AppellantVersusState Of Rajasthan – Respondent

SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Durg Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent