SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2520

SANDEEP MEHTA, FARJAND ALI
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sharavan Saini, Advocate, B.R. Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The instant application for suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC has been preferred on behalf of the appellant-applicant Ramesh Kumar S/o Savaji, who has been convicted under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/- vide the judgment dated 16.12.2020 passed by the learned additional Sessions Judge, Bhinmal, District Jalore in Sessions Case No.22/2016.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that there is no eye-witness of the incident and the entire case of the prosecution hinges upon circumstantial evidence, however, the circumstances put-forth against the accused-applicant are neither definite in tendency nor conclusive in nature. He further submits that since the parents of the deceased-wife were not agreeable for her marriage with the petitioner, therefore, they performed love marriage in the year 2006 and lived a happy married life till the year 2015; sans any complaint of maltreatment. He further submits that deceased-wife sustained an injury on her leg and thereafter, she had been in indisposed condition and thus her demise was a natural death. It is further submitted that applicant-accused is langui

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top