IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
ILESH J. VORA, SANDEEP N. BHATT, JJ.
Kishorebhai @ Kishan Dhirubhai Solanki - Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
Criminal Misc. Application (For Suspension of Sentence) No. 1 of 2023, Criminal Appeal No. 2114 of 2022
Decided On : 03-03-2025
(A) Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 430 - Indian Penal Code - Sections 302, 307, 326, 325, 324, 427, 341, 147, 148, 149 - Application for suspension of sentence - Conviction for murder and other offences - The applicant was convicted for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment among other sentences - The court found that the evidence presented, including eyewitness accounts and medical reports, supported the conviction - The applicant's claims regarding the reliability of witnesses and cause of death were dismissed as lacking merit. (Paras 3, 5, 10, 20)
(B) Criminal Procedure - Suspension of sentence - The court emphasized that suspension of sentence is only granted in exceptional circumstances, particularly when the conviction may not be sustainable - The court found no grounds for such exceptional circumstances in this case. (Paras 11, 20)
Facts of the case:
The applicant was convicted for the murder of Karshan Satiya, who was assaulted by a group of accused armed with deadly weapons. The deceased succumbed to injuries after a prolonged treatment period.
Findings of Court:
The court upheld the conviction based on the evidence of eyewitnesses and medical reports, concluding that the injuries were serious and directly linked to the cause of death.
Issues: The main issues included the reliability of eyewitness testimony, the cause of death, and whether the applicant's conviction could be suspended.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the evidence supported the conviction and that the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting suspension of the sentence.
Result: Application dismissed.
ORDER :
ILESH J. VORA, J.
1. Rule. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of respondent State. By consent, Rule is fixed forthwith.
2. We have heard Mr.Mehul Sarad Shah, learned advocate and Ms. C.M. Shah, learned APP for the respective parties.
3. By way of this application under Section 430 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, applicant-Bharatbhai @ Appa Alubhai Rachhad, seeks suspension of sentence awarded to him by the Sessions Court concerned for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 307, 326, 325, 324, 427, 341, 147, 148, 149 the Indian Penal Code.
4. The present appeal and the application for suspension of sentence arise from the judgment dated 27.07.2021 and order of sentence passed in Sessions Case Nos. 91 of 2018 and 4 of 2019, whereby, the applicant herein was convicted and sentenced as under:
| Section | Imprisonment | Fine | In default |
| S.302 of IPC | Life imprisonment | Rs. 25,000/- | Imprisonment for 2 months |
| S.307 of IPC | R.I. for 10 years | Rs. 20,000/- | Imprisonment for 30 days |
| S.326 of IPC | R.I. for 7 years | Rs. 7,000 | Imprisonment for 20 days |
| S.325 of IPC | R.I. for 5 years | Rs. 5,000/- | Imprisonment for 15 days |
| S.324 of IPC | R.I. for 3 years | Rs. 3,000/- | Imprisonment for 7 days |
| S.427 of IPC | S.I. for 1 year | ||
| S.341 of IPC | S.I. for 1 month | ||
| S.147 read with S.149 of IPC | S.I. for 1 year | ||
| S.148 read with S.149 of IPC | S.I. for 2 years |
5. Facts and circumstances giving rise to file present application are that on the date of incident i.e. 18.05.2018, between 12:00 to 12:30 in night hours, seven accused armed with deadly weapons like swords, skype (dhariya), knife, iron rod, formed unlawful assembly and laid an indiscriminate assault on the deceased Karshan Satiya and complainant PW:8 Ajay Makwana. The case in details are that on 18.05.2018, at about 12:00 o’clock in night, the deceased Karshanbhai along with his friend complainant PW:8 Ajay Makwana had proceeded to take dinner. They were in Alto Car allegedly, driven by deceased. When they reached near Chakku Talavadi, Gogha Road, Bhavnagar, the accused Bharat Ahir (present applicant), Siddhraj, Champu Ahir, Keval Ahir, Kishan Solanki, Hardik and Satish were standing in the road with their respective vehicles. When car arrived, the accused broken the windscreen of the car and took out the deceased from the car. The accused Bharat Ahir and Siddhraj armed with swords inflicted blows on the body of the deceased and when the complainant PW:9 Ajay Makwana came to rescue the deceased, he was severely assaulted by the accused with the swords. The accused Champu Ahir and others having deadly weapons like skype, knives and iron pipes, assaulted the deceased on the various parts of his body and thereafter, due to hue and cry, they ran away with their respective weapons. PW:10 Sajan Chauhla being a resident of nearby area was standing nearby the place of incident and after hearing the shouting, he went to the place and had saw the incident. The brother of the deceased came to know about the incident and he was rushed to the place of the incident. The deceased was taken to Government Hospital, Bhavnagar then shifted to private clinic for twice and then, lastly, he was at Ahmedabad Civil Hospital and succumbed to injuries, on 01.08.2018. In the aforesaid background facts, the offence of murder was added with the permission of the Court. After registration of the offence, the investigation was proceeded. The applicant accused and others had been arrested. The persons who were not known to the eyewitnesses, the T.I. Parade of the said accused held by the Executive Magistrate. The weapons discovered and recovered at the instance of the accused. The I.O. collected the medical treatment case papers of the deceased as well as the complainant PW:8. He also recorded the statements of the witnesses. The motive behind the murder was the dispute with the accused Kishan Solanki. In such circumstances, the I.O. laid a chargesheet before the Judicial Magistrate and the same was committed to the Court of Sessions, Bhavnagar. In order to prov
Suspension of sentence is only granted in exceptional circumstances, particularly when the conviction may not be sustainable, which was not established in this case.
The presence of hostile witnesses does not negate the sufficiency of evidence supporting a conviction when corroborated by other credible testimonies.
Suspension of sentence pending appeal in serious offences requires careful consideration of evidence and potential for acquittal, particularly in light of questionable witness reliability and inconsi....
The court reaffirmed that the discretionary power to suspend a sentence under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C. requires a prima facie case and consideration of the gravity of the offense.
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 304 Part-II of IPC while reducing the sentence from 7 years to 5 years due to the impulsive nature of the act and the appellant's prior detention.
In murder convictions, post-conviction suspension of sentence is rare; courts assess evidence's prima facie durability and must have compelling justifications.
Suspension of sentence and release on bail – Parameters governing suspension of sentence post-conviction are qualitatively distinct from those applicable at stage of pre-trial bail – Such relief can ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.