Back
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Praveen – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 43/2022, Police Station Kotwali Nagaur, District Nagaur, for the offences under Sections 8/15 & 8/21 of the NDPS act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that after rejection of the first bail application on 22.02.2022, the charge sheet has been filed. The recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is also entitled for the grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
6. accordingly, this second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Praveen S/o Baldevram shall be
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the nature of the recovered contraband and the expected duration of the trial.
The court considered the peculiar circumstances prevailing in the country due to the pandemic of COVID-19, the nature of the offence, and the duration of the petitioner's incarceration in reaching th....
Grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on absence of recovery of contraband from the petitioner's possession and reliance on the statement of co-accused for implication.
The decision was based on the lack of credible evidence connecting the petitioner with the recovery of contraband and the expected lengthy trial duration.
The court's decision was influenced by the lack of material connecting the petitioner with the alleged offense and the fact that the co-accused had already been enlarged on bail.
The decision to grant bail was based on the lack of evidence connecting the petitioner with the recovery of contraband and the absence of crucial evidence, as well as the absence of pending or decide....
Granting bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the totality of the facts and circumstances without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
The court may grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on the circumstances and the nature of the alleged offences, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case.
The court's decision was influenced by the similarity of the petitioner's case to the co-accused who had been granted bail and the absence of recovery of contraband from the petitioner's possession, ....
The peculiar circumstances prevailing in the country due to the pandemic of COVID-19 influenced the Court's decision to grant bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
