Back
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Pramod Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.202/2019, Police Station Ramsinghpur, District Sriganganagar for the offences under Section 8/29 NDPS Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
3. The first bail application of the petitioner was allowed vide order dated 02.09.2020 on the ground that the co-accused Sattar Khan has already been enlarged on bail. Thereafter, the bail cancellation was filed by the State against the present petitioner and the same was allowed by this Court on 04.05.2022. Hence, the petitioner was arrested by the trial court. In these circumstances, this Second bail application has been filed by the petitioner.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that except the statement of co-accused Sattar Khan, there is no material available on record to connect the present petitioner with the recovery of contraband tablets in this case. He further submits that there are no call details of the petitioner with the person from whom the cont
The court's decision was influenced by the lack of material connecting the petitioner with the alleged offense and the fact that the co-accused had already been enlarged on bail.
The decision was based on the lack of credible evidence connecting the petitioner with the recovery of contraband and the expected lengthy trial duration.
The decision to grant bail was based on the lack of evidence connecting the petitioner with the recovery of contraband and the absence of crucial evidence, as well as the absence of pending or decide....
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the nature of the recovered contraband and the expected duration of the trial.
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the lack of evidence connecting the petitioner with the recovery of contraband drugs and the petitioner's prolonged incarceration.
The court's decision was influenced by the similarity of the petitioner's case to the co-accused who had been granted bail and the absence of recovery of contraband from the petitioner's possession, ....
Grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. based on absence of recovery of contraband from the petitioner's possession and reliance on the statement of co-accused for implication.
The court considered the absence of the accused at the spot of contraband recovery and the sale of the vehicle in which the contraband was found as grounds for granting bail under the NDPS Act.
The court considered the nature of the recovered contraband and the expected trial duration in granting bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
