SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1319

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Vishnu Prasad Garg Alias Vishnu Prakash Garg – Appellant
Versus
Chand Bai – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Alok Chaturvedi, Advocate, Shailendra Kumar, Advocate, Neeraj K. Tiwari, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - This writ petition under article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed assailing the legality and validity of the order dated 01.012.2021 passed by the learned additional District Judge, No.1, ajmer in Civil First appeal No.33/2017 whereby an application filed by the petitioner-appellant (tenant) under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 C.P.C. seeking amendment in the written statement, has been dismissed.

2. The facts in brief are that predecessor-in-interest of the respondents-plaintiffs Smt. Chand Bai filed a suit for eviction against the petitioner-defendant on the grounds inter-alia reasonable and bonafide necessity of the subject shop for her grandsons Saurabh and Sandeep. The aforesaid suit was decreed by the learned trial court vide its judgment dated 25.08.2006. During pendency of the civil first appeal, the petitioner filed an application dated 15.09.2021 under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 C.P.C. seeking amendment in the written statement incorporating two subsequent events, i.e., acquisition of alternative accommodation and sale of one shop during pendency of the appeal. The application has been dismissed by the lea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top