SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2586

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Kailash Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Umesh Kant Vyas, Advocate, Javed Gauri, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-a of SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act, on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.121/2021, Police Station Begun, District Chittorgarh, for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 342, 323, 327, 307, 302, 384 I.P.C. and Sections 3(2) (V) of SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the order dated 11.02.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities Cases), Chittorgarh whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

2. Counsel for the appellant submits that similarly situated co-accused Yogesh Kumar S/o Ladu Ram (CRLaS No.146/2022), Bheru Lal, Lilashankar, Babu Lal Dhakar, Sunil, Bablu Kumar, Deepak Kumar Rathore & Dinesh Chandra have already been granted bail by this Court and the case of present petitioner is not distinguishable from those of the co-accused. The accused-appellant is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant. The learned court below ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top