HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Pappu Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 289 of 2022
Decided On : 10-05-2022
Bail - SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act - The court set aside the order rejecting the bail application and granted bail to the accused-appellant based on major contradictions in the statements of the prosecutrix and the anticipated lengthy trial period.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 14a(2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the rejection of his bail application. He was in custody for offenses under IPC and the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the rejection of the bail application cannot be sustained and granted bail to the accused-appellant.
Issues: The main issue was the rejection of the bail application filed on behalf of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the major contradictions in the statements of the prosecutrix and the anticipated lengthy trial period as grounds for granting bail to the accused-appellant.
Final Decision: The instant appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. The accused-appellant was ordered to be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14a(2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.0050/2022, Police Station Phalodi, District Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 354 & 376 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(w)(i) & 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge Scheduled Cast/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of atrocities act Cases), Jodhpur whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that prosecutrix is a major lady; there are major contradictions in the statements of prosecutrix recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C.; the challan of the case has already been presented; accused-appellant is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant. The learned court below has grossly erred in law and facts as well in declining to release the appellant on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Public Prosecutor & learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant and also perused the material available on record.
5. Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that the order rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellant, cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside.
6. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities act Cases), Jophpur is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant, Pappu Ram @ Pappu Lal S/o alsi Ram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.0050/2022, Police Station Phalodi, District Jodhpur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The court considered the contradictions in the statements of the prosecutrix and the anticipated lengthy trial period as grounds for granting bail to the accused-appellant.
The court considered the compromise between the parties and the lengthy trial process as grounds for setting aside the order and granting bail to the accused-appellant.
The court established that the rejection of bail must be justified by substantial reasons, particularly when similar cases have resulted in bail being granted.
The court's decision to grant bail to the accused-appellant was based on the consideration of the entirety of facts and circumstances available on record, and the finding that the order rejecting the....
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the prosecutrix's statement and the length of the trial, highlighting the importance of evidence and the practical considerations of trial duration in ....
The court's decision to grant bail was based on the consideration of the entirety of facts and circumstances available on record, highlighting the importance of a thorough review of the case before m....
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the rejection of a bail application can be set aside if it is found to be unsustainable.
The court's decision to grant bail to the accused-appellant was based on the consideration of the entirety of facts and circumstances available on record.
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the order rejecting the bail application can be set aside if found unsustainable.
The court established that the age of the prosecutrix and the completion of the investigation are significant factors in determining bail under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.