SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 918

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Pappu Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 289 of 2022
Decided On : 10-05-2022

Advocates appeared:
J.K. Suthar, Advocate, Anita Gehlot, Advocate, D.L.R. Vyas, Advocate

The court considered the contradictions in the statements of the prosecutrix and the anticipated lengthy trial period as grounds for granting bail to the accused-appellant.

Headnote:

Bail - SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act - The court set aside the order rejecting the bail application and granted bail to the accused-appellant based on major contradictions in the statements of the prosecutrix and the anticipated lengthy trial period.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 14a(2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the rejection of his bail application. He was in custody for offenses under IPC and the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the rejection of the bail application cannot be sustained and granted bail to the accused-appellant.

Issues: The main issue was the rejection of the bail application filed on behalf of the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the major contradictions in the statements of the prosecutrix and the anticipated lengthy trial period as grounds for granting bail to the accused-appellant.

Final Decision: The instant appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside. The accused-appellant was ordered to be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14a(2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.0050/2022, Police Station Phalodi, District Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 354 & 376 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(w)(i) & 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge Scheduled Cast/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of atrocities act Cases), Jodhpur whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that prosecutrix is a major lady; there are major contradictions in the statements of prosecutrix recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C.; the challan of the case has already been presented; accused-appellant is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant. The learned court below has grossly erred in law and facts as well in declining to release the appellant on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Public Prosecutor & learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant and also perused the material available on record.

5. Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that the order rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellant, cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside.

6. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 23.03.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities act Cases), Jophpur is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant, Pappu Ram @ Pappu Lal S/o alsi Ram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.0050/2022, Police Station Phalodi, District Jodhpur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top