HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 232 of 2022
Decided On : 29-03-2022
Bail - SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act - The court allowed the appeal and set aside the order rejecting the bail application, granting bail to the accused-appellant based on the consideration that the co-accused had already been granted bail, charge-sheet had been filed, and the trial would take a sufficiently long time.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 14 a (2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the rejection of his bail application in connection with F.I.R. No.306/2019, Police Station Bhirani, District Hanumangarh, for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3 (2) (Va), 3 (1) (V) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act.
Finding of the Court:
The court, upon considering the arguments and the fact that the co-accused had already been granted bail, charge-sheet had been filed, and the trial would take a sufficiently long time, allowed the appeal and set aside the order rejecting the bail application, granting bail to the accused-appellant.
Issues: The main issue was the rejection of the bail application under the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act for the offences mentioned in the F.I.R.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the fact that the co-accused had already been granted bail, charge-sheet had been filed, and the trial would take a sufficiently long time, leading to the conclusion that the appellant deserved to be enlarged on bail.
Final Decision: The instant appeal was allowed, and the impugned order rejecting the bail application was set aside, ordering the release of the accused-appellant on bail.
JUDGMENT
Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14 a (2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act on behalf of the appellant, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.306/2019, Police Station Bhirani, District Hanumangarh, registered for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3 (2) (Va), 3 (1) (V) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the order dated 08.03.2022 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act Cases, Hanumangarh, whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.
2. as per the orders dated 15.03.2022 and 23.03.2022 notice has been issued to the complainant. as per papers produced before the Court; complainant is in judicial custody in District Dadri, State Harayana.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor stated that service upon respondent No.2 is complete. Despite service, nobody appears on behalf of the respondent No.2.
4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
5. Learned counsel for the appellant stated that except the offences punishable under Section 3 (2) (Va), 3 (1) (V) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act remaining offences are triable by Magistrate; undisputedly, property was sold to the complainant by co-accused Narayan @ Nanu, who has already been granted benefit of bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 01.10.2020; charge-sheet has been filed; and the trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the appellant prays that the appeal may be allowed.
6. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal but does not controvert the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the appellant.
7. Thus, having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced and particularly looking to the fact that co-accused Narayan @ Nanu has already been granted bail; charge-sheet has been filed; and trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
8. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 08.03.2022 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act Cases, Hanumangarh, is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant, Ram Singh S/o Shri Tulchhi Ram @ Tulsi Ram @ Tulchha Ram, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.306/2019, Police Station Bhirani, District Hanumangarh, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
The consideration of the co-accused's bail, charge-sheet filing, and trial duration influenced the court's decision in granting bail to the accused-appellant.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion in granting bail under the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act, considering the circumstances and arguments presented.
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the entirety of facts and circumstances, and the arguments presented.
The court established that bail can be granted under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act when the circumstances indicate that the accused may not pose a flight risk and the trial may take consid....
The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the fact that star witnesses had turned hostile, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
The court established that in bail applications under the SC/ST Act, the individual circumstances of the accused, the status of co-accused, and the progress of the trial are critical factors in deter....
The court established that in cases involving non-serious charges and prolonged trial durations, bail may be granted even under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
The court considered the nature of the offenses, absence of injuries, and expected trial duration in deciding to grant bail to the accused-appellant.
The court established that bail should be granted based on parity with co-accused and the anticipated length of the trial.
The court has the discretion to grant bail after considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the rejection of a bail application can be set aside if it is found to be unsustainable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.