SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1677

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Devendra Kachhawaha, J.
Bhera Ram @ Vijay Choudhary - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 532 of 2021
Decided On : 29-06-2021

Advocates appeared:
Bhopal Singh Choudhary, Advocate, A.R. Choudhary, Advocate, Bhagat Dadhich, Advocate

The court established that bail can be granted under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act when the circumstances indicate that the accused may not pose a flight risk and the trial may take considerable time.

Headnote:

[BAIL] - [SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act] - [The court granted bail to the appellants, emphasizing the need for a fair trial and considering the nature of the charges under the SC/ST Act, alongside the lack of specific injuries attributed to the appellants. The court interpreted the provisions of the SC/ST Act and the Cr.P.C. to favor the appellants' release, given the circumstances of the case.]

Fact of the Case:

The appeal was filed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by the appellants, who were in judicial custody for various offences, including those under the SC/ST Act and the Indian Penal Code. Their bail application was previously rejected by the Special Judge.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellants were wrongly implicated due to civil disputes and that the trial would take time. It noted the lack of specific injuries attributed to the appellants and the nature of the charges.

Issues: Whether the appellants should be granted bail considering the nature of the charges and the circumstances of the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appellants deserved bail based on the totality of the circumstances, including the nature of the allegations and the absence of specific grievous injuries linked to them.

Result: The appeal was allowed, the previous order was set aside, and the appellants were granted bail upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

JUDGMENT

Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-A(2) SC/ ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I..R. No.210/2021, Police Station Bilara, District Jodhpur, registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 325 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(R)(S), 3(2)(VA) and 3(1)(F) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the order dated 16.06.2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur Metro, whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants appearing through video conferencing and learned Public Prosecutor, present-inperson. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant stated that except the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(R)(S), 3(2)(VA) and 3(1) (F) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act remaining offences are triable by Magistrate; appellants have wrongly been implicated in this case due to other civil disputes; and the trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the appellants prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the appellants.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor, present-in-person and learned counsel for the complainant appearing through video conferencing have opposed the appeal. Learned Public Prosecutor stated that 3-3 other cases were earlier registered against the accused-appellants namely, Bhera Ram @ Vijay Choudhary and Rajendra and 6 other cases were registered against accusedappellant, Omprakash. He further stated that injury No.1 of Laxman Ram is grievous-blunt in nature.

5. In reply, learned counsel for the appellants stated that out of six cases registered against Omprakash, two cases have already been decided and no other specific injury has been attributed to any of the appellants.

6. Thus, having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the appellants deserves to be enlarged on bail.

7. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 16.06.2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Jodhpur Metro, is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellants - (1) Bhera Ram @ Vijay Choudhary S/o Bhana Ram, (2) Rajendra S/o Bhera Ram and (3) Om Prakash S/o Bhera Ram, all arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.210/2021, Police Station Bilara, District Jodhpur, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top