PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Sohan Puri – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - In the wake of instant surge in COVID - 19 cases and spread of its highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in the Court, for the safety of all concerned.
2. These criminal appeals, under Section 374 Cr.P.C. have been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
Appeal No. 894/2005:
"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the appeal of the appellants may kindly be allowed and the judgment dt. 25.11.05 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 1, Bikaner in Sessions case No. 317/2003 - State v. Sohan Puri & Ors. may kindly be quashed and set aside to the extent of conviction to the appellants, and the appellants may kindly be acquitted from the charges."
Appeal No. 910/2005:
"Therefore, it is prayed by the humble appellant that this Criminal appeal may kindly be allowed and the impugned Judgment dated 25.11.2005 passed by the Additional Session Judge (Fast Track) No. 1, Bikaner may kindly be quashed and set aside and benefit of probation act may kindly be given to the present appellant because no other criminal case is pending against him, therefore, it would in the interest
Amit Kapoor vs. Ramesh Chander and Ors. (2012) 9 SCC 460
M.E. Shivalingamurthy vs. C.B.I. Bengaluru (2020) 2 SCC 768
R. Prakash vs. State of Karnataka
Raj Kapoor and Ors. vs. State of Punjab and Ors. AIR 1980 SC 258 : (1980) 1 SCC 43
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.