HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Ashok Kumar Gaur, J.
Abdul Rahman – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3476/2022 Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3477/2022
Decided On : 15-03-2022
Reservation - ExS5 Category - The court dismissed the writ petitions seeking reservation under ExS5 category for admission in MBBS/BDS Course, finding that the respondents had complied with the Standard of Procedure (SOP) and the bifurcation of seats was done in accordance with the prescribed ratio.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought reservation under ExS5 category for admission in MBBS/BDS Course, alleging that the respondents did not implement the 1% reservation to Ex-Servicemen properly.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondents had revised the merit list and bifurcated seats in accordance with the Standard of Procedure (SOP) and the prescribed ratio, and therefore dismissed the writ petitions.
Issues: The issues involved the eligibility of the petitioners for reservation under ExS5 category, the implementation of 1% reservation to Ex-Servicemen, and the compliance with the Standard of Procedure (SOP) in preparing the merit list and bifurcating seats.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the compliance of the respondents with the Standard of Procedure (SOP) and the prescribed ratio for bifurcation of seats, as well as the absence of any illegality in the exercise carried out by the respondents.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petitions filed by the petitioners, finding no illegality in the exercise carried out by the respondents.
JUDGMENT
1. The instant writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction to extend the benefit of reservation under ExS5 category as per allotment list dated 03.02.2022 and further, permit the petitioners to get admission in MBBS/BDS Course. The petitioners also prayed that the provisional allotment list of PwD and WDP candidates of Round-I dated 17.02.2022 and 18.02.2022 may be revised.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner-(S.B.CWP No.3476/2022) submitted that father of the petitioner-Abdul Rahman was earlier working in the Indian Army and as such, due to disability attributed in service, he was discharged from service.
3. Learned counsel submitted that notification issued by the NEET Counselling Board-2021 provided 1% reservation on Horizontal basis to Defence Personnel (serving and retired) of Rajasthan Origin and Para Military Personnel (serving/retired) of Rajasthan Origin.
4. Learned counsel submitted that since father of the petitioner-Abdul Rahman was falling in ExS5 category and as such, provisional merit list was issued for counselling of Round-I and the petitioner-Abdul Rahman was shown at Serial No.40 and petitioner-Nikhil Choudhary was shown at Sr. No.38, in ExS5 Category.
5. Learned counsel submitted that the respondents, later on, issued another provisional list by revising earlier merit list and thereby, name of the petitioner was placed at Serial No.17.
6. Learned counsel submitted that the amended provisional combined merit list, which was issued again by the respondents on 15.02.2022 had asked the candidates to join the allotted College and the petitioners were confident that they were be allotted the Government College in ExS5 category, however, the respondents denied the eligibility of the petitioners to consider their case in ExS5 category and 1% reservation to Ex-Servicemen, has not been implemented in proper manner by the respondents.
7. This Court had asked learned counsel appearing for the respondents-NEET Counselling Board as what was the criteria, which was decided by them to bifurcate seats between two different categories, for which 1% seats were reserved as Defence Personnel and Para Military Personnel are made eligible for the said reservation of 1% seats in Government Colleges.
8. This Court, had asked learned counsel appearing for the respondents as whether any candidate falling in ExS5 Category, has been given admission, who has lower merit than the petitioners.
9. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the respondents had initially prepared the merit list by assigning the different categories to the Wards of Defence Personnel, however, the same was not done as per the Standard of Procedure (SOP) dated 01.07.2020 and as such, when the writ petitions were filed before this Court, the respondents had decided to revise the merit list after strictly complying with the SOP dated 01.07.2020.
10. Learned counsel submitted that in the revised list, the candidates of ExS4 category were having better merit and priority and as such, admissions were granted to such candidates.
11. Learned counsel submitted that no person in EXS5 category lower than the petitioners in merit, has been given admission in Government Medical College.
12. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners in rejoinder have raised a grievance that a combined list of WDP and WPP has been prepared and as such, the petitioners now want consideration of their cases by drawing the separate merit list by excluding WPP candidates.
13. This Court asked learned counsel for the respondents- Mr.Harshal Tholia as what was the basis of prescribing the ratio of seats between the WDP/WPP categories.
14. Learned counsel for the respondents has filed an additional affidavit along-with the copy of the order dated 04.07.2012 issued by the State Government, wherein it has been decided that the ratio between the Defence Personnel and Para Military Personnel for allocation of seats in MBBS/BDS Course would be in 3:1.
15. This
Compliance with the Standard of Procedure (SOP) and the prescribed ratio for reservation and seat allocation is crucial in determining eligibility for reservation and admission in educational courses....
The court affirmed that the SOP for WDP admissions was valid and did not violate equality principles, as it adhered to established guidelines.
In the absence of specific reservation provisions, entitlement to reservation for admission cannot be claimed as a matter of right.
No reservation exists for the children of Armed Forces personnel invalidated due to disabilities for admissions, based on current policy frameworks.
Candidates participating in a selection process cannot later challenge its fairness based on unfavorable outcomes, as established by prior Supreme Court rulings.
The court upheld the classification of admission preferences for wards of military and para-military personnel, emphasizing merit as the sole criterion for admissions.
Higher merit cannot override established horizontal reservation rules; allotment must strictly adhere to statutory frameworks.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.