Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH, MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI, JJ
Kailash Choudhary Son Of Shri Teja Ram Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Chairman, Neet (U.G.) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant challenges neet reservation (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court reviews reservation policy (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. appeal dismissed (Para 9 , 10) |
Order :
1. This appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant challenging the judgment and order dated 21.11.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.14694/2024 whereby the aforesaid writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge.
2. Brief facts of the case are that in pursuance of the Public Notice dated 09.02.2024, the appellant submitted an application for the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET-UG, 2024). The appellant-petitioner in the writ petition challenged ‘Clause 5.e’ of the said notification with regard to reservation to the wards of Defence Personnel and Paramilitary Personnel.
3. Learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition filed on behalf of the appellant-petitioner held as under:-
“14. Upon considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, an assiduous scanning of records and judgments cited at Bar, this Court is of the following stance:
14.1 That the instant matter pertains to considering the petitioners’ candidature unde
Candidates participating in a selection process cannot later challenge its fairness based on unfavorable outcomes, as established by prior Supreme Court rulings.
The court upheld the classification of admission preferences for wards of military and para-military personnel, emphasizing merit as the sole criterion for admissions.
The court affirmed that the SOP for WDP admissions was valid and did not violate equality principles, as it adhered to established guidelines.
The eligibility for admission under the Children and Wards of Defence Personnel category requires a clear distinction between those boarded out with service-attributable disabilities and those who co....
The court confirmed that prioritization based on educational qualifications in admission processes does not violate constitutional equality guarantees.
The court upheld the University’s reservation policy for Armed Forces personnel, affirming that inclusion of Para-Military and Police Personnel is consistent with directives from both the Ministry of....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
