SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1877

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Ganesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Akshat Chaudhary, Advocate, F.R. Meena, Advocate

JUDGMENT

anoop Kumar Dhand, J. - The instant application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. preferred on behalf of petitioner, who has been arrested in FIR No.267/2021 of Police Station Rupangarh, District ajmer for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 376 (2) (n), 384 and 323 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant FIR is counter blast to the FIR lodged by the father of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the age of the prosecutrix is 26 years and as per the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the prosecutrix has alleged that the incident of rape was committed with her by the petitioner on several occasions and even 2-3 months before lodging of the FIR. Learned counsel further submits that there is inordinate delay of more than 3 months in lodging the FIR for which no reasonable explanation has been given. Learned counsel further submits that the allegations of rape are not corroborated with the medical evidence and petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2021 and after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted. So, indulgence of bail be granted to petitioner.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top