HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Ashok Kumar Gaur, J.
Jeetu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 18015/2021
Decided On : 18-01-2022
Bail Application - Age of Prosecutrix - Consensual Relationship - Release of Accused on Bail
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was arrested for the offence under Section 363 IPC in connection with an FIR. The petitioner argued that the prosecutrix went with him willingly and admitted to having a consensual relationship with him. The age of the prosecutrix was yet to be determined.
Finding of the Court:
The Court, considering the statement of the prosecutrix, the nature of allegation, and the period of custody of the petitioner, deemed it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Issues: Age determination of the prosecutrix, consensual relationship, and release on bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the statement of the prosecutrix, the nature of the allegation, and the period of custody of the petitioner.
Final Decision: The bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was allowed, and the accused-petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties.
ORDER
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The present petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.131/2021, registered at Police Station Banetha, District Tonk for the offence under Section 363 IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the complainant i.e. mother of the prosecutrix lodged an FIR stating that her daughter is about 17 years of age.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. clearly establishes that she had gone on her own will with the present petitioner and she also admitted of having physical relations with the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the consensual relationship between the prosecutrix and the petitioner does not make out any case and committing rape on her.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the age of the prosecutrix though has been mentioned as 12.07.2005, however, her age is yet to be determined and to be decided during trial.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner also 20-21 years old and he is in custody since 22.10.2021 and Police after completion of investigation has already filed the final report.
7. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submitted that the prosecutrix is about 16-17 years of age, and as such, provision of POCSO Act has been applied in the present case.
8. I have heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.
9. This Court, considering the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C, the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, the period of custody of the petitioner, the age of the prosecutrix is yet to be decided and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.
10. Accordingly, the present bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Jeetu Kumar S/o Nathulal, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 131/2021, registered at Police Station Banetha, District Tonk, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The court considered the statement of the prosecutrix, completion of police investigation, and the young age of the petitioner in granting bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
The court considered the maturity of the prosecutrix and the completion of the investigation as crucial factors in granting bail to the applicant.
The court has the discretion to grant bail based on the material presented and overall consideration of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Bail – Under POCSO Act, age of victim is decisive factor – If victim is below 18 years of age, law presumes that she is incapable of giving valid consent.
The solemnized marriage and cohabitation of the applicant and the prosecutrix were considered as grounds for granting bail.
The POCSO Act was not meant to criminalize consensual romantic relationships between young adults, and various factors, including the age of the victim and accused, familial relationship, and social ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.