SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1803

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Ashok Kumar Gaur, J.
Jeetu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 18015/2021
Decided On : 18-01-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka, Adv. (Through Video Conferencing), for the Appellant
Mr. Laxman Meena, Public Prosecutor., for the Respondent.

The decision to release the accused on bail was based on the consideration of the prosecutrix's statement, the nature of the allegation, and the period of custody of the petitioner.

Headnote:

Bail Application - Age of Prosecutrix - Consensual Relationship - Release of Accused on Bail

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner was arrested for the offence under Section 363 IPC in connection with an FIR. The petitioner argued that the prosecutrix went with him willingly and admitted to having a consensual relationship with him. The age of the prosecutrix was yet to be determined.

Finding of the Court:

The Court, considering the statement of the prosecutrix, the nature of allegation, and the period of custody of the petitioner, deemed it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Issues: Age determination of the prosecutrix, consensual relationship, and release on bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court's decision was influenced by the statement of the prosecutrix, the nature of the allegation, and the period of custody of the petitioner.

Final Decision: The bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was allowed, and the accused-petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and sureties.

ORDER

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The present petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.131/2021, registered at Police Station Banetha, District Tonk for the offence under Section 363 IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the complainant i.e. mother of the prosecutrix lodged an FIR stating that her daughter is about 17 years of age.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. clearly establishes that she had gone on her own will with the present petitioner and she also admitted of having physical relations with the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the consensual relationship between the prosecutrix and the petitioner does not make out any case and committing rape on her.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the age of the prosecutrix though has been mentioned as 12.07.2005, however, her age is yet to be determined and to be decided during trial.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the petitioner also 20-21 years old and he is in custody since 22.10.2021 and Police after completion of investigation has already filed the final report.

7. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submitted that the prosecutrix is about 16-17 years of age, and as such, provision of POCSO Act has been applied in the present case.

8. I have heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.

9. This Court, considering the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C, the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, the period of custody of the petitioner, the age of the prosecutrix is yet to be decided and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

10. Accordingly, the present bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Jeetu Kumar S/o Nathulal, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 131/2021, registered at Police Station Banetha, District Tonk, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top