SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 937

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Pitha Ram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Girdhar Singh Bhati, Advocate, Mahipal Bishnoi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 99/2021 of Police Station Bijrad, District Barmer, for the offence punishable under Sections 365, 384 & 376(2)N of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prosecutrix was a major girl and she admits in her statement that she was talking with the petitioner on phone from last six months. Counsel further submits that the prosecutrix also mentioned in her statement that the petitioner called her in the night about 10 p.m. and when she went in a street then the accused-petitioner took her outside the village and committed rape with her and during this period she did not raised any hue and cry and if anything happened, then it was with the consent of the prosecutrix. Challan of the case has already been presented. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top