SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1852

AKIL KURESHI, SUDESH BANSAL
Somnath Corporation – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Manish Lawaniya, Advocate, Manish Parihar, Advocate, Punit Singhvi, Advocate, Ayush Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner has prayed for quashing a notice dated 21.01.2022 and the order of detention of the transport truck with goods which was done by the State GST authorities. The case of the petitioner is that a consignment of cumin seeds originating from Gujarat was in transit through a State, final destination being in Uttar Pradesh. It was intercepted by the GST authorities at Jaipur on the ground that driver of the vehicle did not carry valid document. The petitioner was issued a show cause notice and the goods along with vehicle have been seized, hence the petition.

2. In our opinion subject to the assessment, the vehicle and the goods should be released on certain conditions which power in any case the respondents have under the State GST act. at the very best the expectation of the department could be to tax the goods and impose maximum possible penalty. as long as these amounts are secured, no purpose would be served in taxing the goods in the vehicle. The goods are perishable and the transport vehicle has been stranded.

3. We are informed that the value of goods is approximately Rs.24.84 lacs on which applicable tax would come to approximately Rs.1.24 lacs. Considerin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top