HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Manoj Kumar Garg, J.
Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 892 of 2021 In S.B.Criminal Appeal No.821 of 2021
Decided On : 01-02-2022
Suspension of Sentence - Criminal Procedure Code - The court allowed the suspension of the substantive sentence awarded to the accused-appellant under Section 389 Cr.P.C. until the final disposal of the appeal, subject to certain conditions.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted for offenses under the NDPS Act and Arms Act and had served 3 years and 5 months of imprisonment out of the total sentence of 7 years. The appeal against the judgment was not likely to be heard in the near future.
Finding of the Court:
The court considered the appellant's time served, the likelihood of the appeal not being heard soon, and the circumstances of the case, and allowed the suspension of the substantive sentence.
Issues: The main issue was whether the substantive sentence awarded to the appellant should be suspended until the final disposal of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found it just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence considering the time served by the appellant and the likelihood of the appeal not being heard in the near future.
Final Decision: The bail application under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. was allowed, and the substantive sentence passed by the trial court against the accused-appellant was suspended until the final disposal of the appeal, subject to certain conditions.
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - This is the second suspension of sentence application under Section 389 Cr.P.C. The first suspension of sentence application of the appellant was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dt. 20.10.2021.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 8/15 of NDPS act & Section 3/25 of arms act and the maximum sentence awarded to the appellants is of 7 years rigorous imprisonment. It is submitted that appellant has served 3 years and 5 months of imprisonment out of the total sentence of 7 years. No other case of NDPS act has been registered against the appellant. The appellant is in judicial custody and hearing of the appeal is likely to take a long time. Therefore, the sentence awarded to the appellant may be suspended.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer of the appellant.
4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case so also the fact that the appellant has already undergone 3 years and 5 months imprisonment out of the total sentence of 7 years and the appeal preferred by the appellant against the impugned judgment is not likely to be heard in near future, I consider it just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence awarded to the accused appellant.
5. accordingly, this bail application under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS acts Cases, Churu vide judgment dated 26.08.2021 in Sessions Case No.236/2018 against accused-appellant amar Singh S/o Leelu @ Dharmpal shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal subject to depositing the fine amount. The appellant shall be released on bail provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/-with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 02.03.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.
2. That if the appellant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.
3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.
4. The appellant shall deposit fine amount as imposed by the trial court.
6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-appellant was tried and convicted. a copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused-appellant does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.
The court has the discretion to suspend the substantive sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. until the final disposal of the appeal, based on the circumstances of the case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of prolonged custody and the likelihood of serving out the sentences awarded by the trial court in granting bail and suspending t....
The court applied Section 389 Cr.P.C. to suspend the sentences of the appellant-applicant during the pendency of the appeal, considering the provisions of the NDPS Act and the overall facts and circu....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to suspend sentences under Section 389 Cr.P.C. when the appellant has strong grounds for assailing the impugned judgment and ....
The court has the discretion to suspend the substantive sentence under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. based on the totality of facts and circumstances, including the custody period and the anticipated delay in the ....
The court established that under Section 389 Cr.P.C., a convicted individual may be granted bail pending appeal if the circumstances, including the nature of the offense and prior convictions, suppor....
The court has the discretion to suspend sentences and grant bail during the pendency of an appeal, considering the facts and circumstances of the case.
The court has the discretion to suspend the substantive sentence under Sec. 389 Cr.P.C. considering the totality of facts and circumstances, including the custody period and the anticipated delay in ....
Suspension of sentence should be considered liberally unless there is any statutory restriction, and the appellate Court has the discretion to suspend a sentence awarded under the NDPS Act, emphasizi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.