SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1727

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vijay Bishnoi, J.
Surendra Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 350 of 2021
Decided On : 05-05-2022

Advocates appeared:
Sumitra Choudhary, Advocate, Mohd. Javed Gauri, Advocate

The court has the discretion to suspend the substantive sentence under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. based on the totality of facts and circumstances, including the custody period and the anticipated delay in the appeal hearing.

Headnote:

Suspension of Sentence - NDPS Act - The court allowed the suspension of the substantive sentence awarded to the accused under the NDPS Act, considering the custody period and the anticipated delay in hearing the appeal.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant-appellant was convicted for offences under the NDPS Act and sentenced to 15 years of rigorous imprisonment. He had already served 8 years and 8 months of the sentence. The appeal hearing was not expected to happen soon.

Finding of the Court:

The court considered the totality of facts and circumstances, including the custody period and the anticipated delay in the appeal hearing, and decided to suspend the substantive sentence.

Issues: Suspension of sentence application under Sec.389 Cr.P.C.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the custody period and the anticipated delay in the appeal hearing as justifying the suspension of the substantive sentence under the NDPS Act.

Final Decision: The suspension of sentence application was allowed, and the substantive sentence was ordered to remain suspended till the final disposal of the appeal, subject to certain conditions.

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties on suspension of sentence application.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant has submitted that the applicant-appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under NDPS act and sentenced for 15 year of rigorous imprisonment vide impugned judgment. It is submitted that out of total sentence, the applicant-appellant has already undergone 8 yeas and 8 months of sentence. It is also submitted that there is no possibility of hearing of the appeal in near future.

3. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, taking into consideration the custody period of the accused applicant-appellant and in view of the fact that the hearing of the appeal will take time, I consider it just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellant.

4. accordingly, this suspension of sentence application filed under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court vide judgment dated 04.03.2017 in Sessions Case No.291/2014 (85/2013) against applicant-appellant - Surendra Pal Singh S/o Shri Bachan Singh shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 06.06.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

    1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

    2. That if the applicant-appellant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

    3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

    5. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused applicant-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused applicant-appellant was tried and convicted. a copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant-appellant does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top