SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1781

FARJAND ALI
Akash Ranjan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S.S. Sahni Through Vc, for the Appellant
Mr. Ramesh Choudhary, Pp, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. By way of filing the instant miscellaneous petition, the petitioner who happens to be an accused of FIR No. 199/2017 registered at Police Station CPS ACB, Jaipur, Distt. Alwar seeking indulgence of this Court for issuance of directions to the authorities for fair and impartial investigation in the matter.

2. Mr. Suresh Kumar Sahni, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR got lodged on 21.07.2017 wherein after conducting investigation, a charge-sheet No. 218/2017 dated 15.09.2017 had been submitted against the accused Radhe Shyam & Mansingh in the Court concerned while keeping the investigation pending in respect of the present petitioner. As per him, earlier when the first charge-sheet was submitted, the evidence was not sufficient enough to charge-sheet the petitioner along with the accused Radhe Shyam and Mansingh and that is why the investigation had been kept pending regarding the role of the present petitioner. But now, there being no fresh material, evidence documentary or oral or in electronic form, the Investigating Agency is hell bent to charge-sheet him which is dehors the legal provision and contrary to the principles of law laid down by Hon'ble th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top