SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1768

FARJAND ALI
Manohar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ajay Singh Through Vc, for the Appellant
Mr. N.S. Gurjar, Pp, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. The instant miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner who happens to be the complainant in Sessions Case No. 57/2014, CIS No. 195/2014 pending in the Court of Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act Cases, Ajmer where the application filed by the petitioner under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. has been rejected and the same has been assailed herein.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the order impugned and the other relevant papers of the charge-sheet made available on record as well as the statement of Prosecution Witness-17 Dr. Bhagwati Prasad Sharma.

3. Bereft of elaborate details, the brief facts necessary for the disposal of the present petition, are that a prosecution came to be launched at the instance of the petitioner for the offence under Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 324 & 307 IPC. Before the culmination of trial, it is noticed by the complainant that the discharge ticket of the victim Barma Ram, although available on the record of the Court but the same could not be tendered into evidence because it was issued by the then Dr. Nishit Bhargav, Superintendent, Neuro Surgery Department, JLN Hospital, Ajmer and who was not pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top