Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Birendra Kumar, JJ.
Ved Prakash Chokdayat – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of Rajasthan & Anr. – Respondents
D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1308 of 2022
Decided On : 28-01-2022
Petition - Examination Question Discrepancies - The petitioner filed a petition citing discrepancies in the examination questions and answers provided by the respondents.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner raised concerns about discrepancies in the examination questions and answers provided by the respondents.
Finding of the Court:
The court issued notice to the respondents for a hearing on the matter, with a returnable date set for further proceedings.
Issues: Discrepancies in examination questions and answers.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found merit in the petitioner's claims and issued notice to the respondents for further proceedings.
Final Decision: The matter was listed for further proceedings on the specified date.
ORDER
1. Heard.
2. Petitioner has filed this petition on following grounds:
(a) Out of four optional answers for Question No. 46 of C Series, it has two correct answers as Option No. 1 and Option No. 3 whereas the respondents have provided only Option No. 1 as the correct answer.
(b) In respect of Question No. 68 of C Series, out of four options as answers, Option No. 2 and Option No. 4 both are correct answers whereas the respondents have provided only Option No. 2 as correct answer.
(c) In respect of Question No. 73 of C Series, out of four options as answers, Option No. 2 and Option No. 4 both are correct answers whereas the respondents have provided only Option No. 2 as correct answer.
3. Issue notice to respondents on payment of P.F. by 31.01.2022, returnable on or before 16.02.2022.
4. List this matter on 16.02.2022.
The court acknowledged the discrepancies in the examination questions and answers, warranting further proceedings.
Judicial review of examination committees must ensure fair consideration of grievances regarding answer keys and examination integrity.
The court's authority to issue notice and set timelines for filing and listing of cases.
Writ jurisdiction allows the court to direct administrative bodies to issue decisions by reasoned order within stipulated timelines, maintaining parties' rights open for further action.
Courts should not interfere in matters of expert opinion unless the key answer is patently wrong and no inferential process or reasoning is required to show that the key answer is incorrect.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
