SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1171

SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Anil – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vijay Sharma, Advocate, Mamta Shandilya, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Satyendra Kumar Singh, J. - This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the applicant, as he has been arrested on 17.11.2022 in connection with Crime No.967/2022, registered at Police Station Dhamnod, District- Dhar (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Sections 363, 376(1) of IPC and section 3/4, of POCSO Act, 2012.

2. Prosecution story in brief is that on 16.11.2022 at about 14:00 to 15:00 hours applicant abducted minor prosecutrix aged about 17 years and 4 months and took her near water tank on his motor cycle and thereafter committed rape upon her. Accordingly, case has been registered.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that prosecutrix was minor at the time of incident. She voluntarily went with the applicant and when her brother saw her along with the applicant she lodged the report against the applicant. He further submits that prosecutrix statement recorded during investigation are inconsistent with her own FIR. FIR is delayed by 7 hours without any reasonable cause. Nothing material has been produced on record with regard to the age of the prosecutrix. The all prosecution case is apparently false. The conclu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top