SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 1228

SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
Deepak – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. R. Bhatnagar, Advocate, Mamta Shandilya, Advocate
Final Result : Allowed

JUDGMENT

Satyendra Kumar Singh, J. - This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the applicant as he has been arrested on 28.10.2022 in connection with Crime No.252/2021 registered at Police Station Bhanpura, District Mandsaur (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2) (n), 376(3) of IPC and Sections 5(l)/6 and 5(j)/6 of POCSO Act.

2. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 09.10.2022 applicant abducted a minor prosecutrix, aged about 15-16 years and thereafter committed rape upon her repeatedly.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the prosecution has failed to produce any document with regard to the age of the prosecutrix. The school Scholar Register entry produced on record is of 8th standard. Prosecutrix in her statement recorded during investigation under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. has admitted that she voluntarily went with the applicant and they have solemnized marriage. They have blessed with a baby girl also and has lived together. Prosecutrix's mother also stated so. No offence is made out against the applicant. His custodial trial is not required. Therefore, he be released on bail.

4. Learned couns

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top