HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Babu Singh Rathore – Appellant
Versus
State & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 660 of 2021
Decided On : 14-01-2022
Lawyers - Bail Application - Interpretation of Bail Provisions under SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed an appeal for bail under Section 14a(2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act in connection with FIR No.117/2021 for various offenses including under the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act. The bail application was rejected by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) Cases, Sri Ganganagar.
Finding of the Court:
The Court, after considering the arguments, found that the appellant deserved to be enlarged on bail and allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and ordering the release of the accused-appellant on bail.
Issues: The main issue was the interpretation of the bail provisions under the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act and whether the appellant should be granted bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court considered the entirety of facts and circumstances, including the absence of specific allegations against the appellant and the nature of the incident, and concluded that the appellant deserved to be enlarged on bail.
Final Decision: The instant appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the accused-appellant was ordered to be released on bail upon fulfilling certain conditions.
JUDGMENT
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).
2. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14a(2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.117/2021, Police Station Sriganganagar Sadar, District Sriganganagar for the offences under Sections 302, 341, 323, 34 of I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(v)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the order dated 23/07/2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) Cases, Sri Ganganagar, whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.
3. Heard. Perused the material available on record.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that on a trivial issue, the dispute arose between both the parties and there was exchange of pelting of bricks and stones in which both the parties have sustained injuries. There is no specific allegation against the present appellant of having inflicted any specific injury to the deceased. Learned counsel further submits that it was a free fight between the parties and there was no intention to cause death of the Rajendra Singh in the present case. The charge sheet in the case has been filed.
5. Learned public prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the appeal.
6. Thus, having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
7. Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 23/07/2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) Cases, Sri Ganganagar is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Babu Singh Rathore S/o Sh. Samundra Singh arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 117/2021, Police Station Sriganganagar Sadar, District Sriganganagar shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees: Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The decision was based on the consideration of the entirety of facts and circumstances, including the non-support of the prosecution case by material witnesses and the bail granted to the co-accused.
The lack of evidence connecting the appellant with the murder and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the situation of the country and the jails influenced the court's decision to allow the appeal....
The credibility of evidence and the lack of credible evidence against the appellant influenced the court's decision to grant bail.
The court's decision was based on the consideration of the entirety of facts and circumstances, including the statement of the prosecutrix, in allowing the appeal and ordering the release of the accu....
The interpretation of evidence and circumstances, including the relationship between the appellant and the prosecutrix, played a crucial role in the Court's decision to grant bail.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the country and jails can be considered as a factor in granting bail, especially in cases where no overt acts are reported against the appellants.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to grant bail based on the entirety of facts and circumstances, including the filing of the charge-sheet and the comparison ....
The Court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.