HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Gopal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1068 of 2021
Decided On : 19-01-2022
Lawyers - SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act - The court allowed the appeal and set aside the order rejecting the bail application, considering the lack of evidence connecting the appellant with the murder and the unprecedented situation of the country due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 14a(2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the rejection of his bail application in connection with a case involving offenses under Sections 302, 201, 394 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(V), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was no evidence connecting the appellant with the murder, and considering the present situation of the country due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the appeal was allowed, and the appellant was ordered to be released on bail.
Issues: Lack of evidence connecting the appellant with the murder, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the situation of the country and the jails.
Ratio Decidendi: The lack of evidence connecting the appellant with the murder and the unprecedented situation of the country due to the COVID-19 pandemic influenced the court's decision to allow the appeal and set aside the order rejecting the bail application.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the order rejecting the bail application was set aside, with the appellant being ordered to be released on bail.
JUDGMENT
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not physically appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).
2. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14a(2) SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No. 260/2021, Police Station Bijoliya, District Bhilwara for the offences under Sections 302, 201, 394 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(V), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act against the order dated 30.10.2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) Cases, Bhilwara, whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.
3. Heard. Perused the material available on record.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in the present case, there is no evidence to connect the present petitioner with the murder of Ramkishan. He further submits that charge-sheet in the case has been filed. He submits that except the recovery of clothes of petitioner and one ajay Sharma at the instance of the petitioner, there is no evidence on record to show the connectivity of the present petitioner. Thus, the appeal filed by the appellant deserves to be accepted.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant are unable to point out the fact that the clothes which were recovered at the instance of the petitioner were blood stained or not.
6. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case as also the present situation of the country due to pandemic of corona virus (COVID-19), in particular the jails, this Court is of the opinion that the appeal of the appellant deserves to be allowed.
7. Consequently, the instant appeals is allowed. The impugned orders dated 30.10.2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) Cases, Bhilwara is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellants Gopal S/o Bheru Lal arrested in connection with FIR No. 260/2021, Police Station Bijoliya, District Bhilwara shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees: Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
The lack of evidence connecting the appellant with the murder and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the situation of the country and the jails influenced the court's decision to allow the appeal....
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the country and jails can be considered as a factor in granting bail, especially in cases where no overt acts are reported against the appellants.
The court's decision was based on the consideration of the entirety of facts and circumstances, including the statement of the prosecutrix, in allowing the appeal and ordering the release of the accu....
The credibility of evidence and the lack of credible evidence against the appellant influenced the court's decision to grant bail.
Interpretation of bail provisions under the SC/ST (Prevention of atrocities) act and the consideration of facts and circumstances in granting bail.
The decision was based on the consideration of the entirety of facts and circumstances, including the non-support of the prosecution case by material witnesses and the bail granted to the co-accused.
The interpretation of evidence and circumstances, including the relationship between the appellant and the prosecutrix, played a crucial role in the Court's decision to grant bail.
The Court has the discretion to grant bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.