SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2108

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Raj Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Saksham Associates – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Shridhar Mehta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present application has been filed by the applicant under Section 11 of the arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996 for appointment of the arbitrator to resolve the dispute which has arisen between the applicant and the respondent Nos.1 and 2 on account of non-payment of the amount due to the applicant.

2. This Court after hearing learned counsel for the applicant issued notices to the respondents on 02/08/2021. as per the office report dated 23/09/2021, notices are reported to be served upon the respondent Nos.1 and 2. Despite service, nobody appeared before this Court on 02/12/2021, therefore, the matter was adjourned for 09/12/2021 but on 09/12/2021 also, nobody appeared, therefore, the matter was again adjourned for 16/12/2021. But on 16/12/201 again nobody appeared on behalf of the respondents. Thus, the matter was listed today but even today, nobody has appeared for the respondents, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no option but to proceed with the matter.

3. Heard the counsel and perused the material available on record.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the parties entered into an agreement - annexure-1 and a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top