SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2057

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Hari Singh – Appellant
Versus
Lalit Kumar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sandeep Mathur, Advocate, V.P. Mathur, Advocate

JUDGMENT

anoop Kumar Dhand, J. - The present civil misc. appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles act, 1988 has been preferred by the appellants-claimants aggrieved with the judgment and award dated 26.04.2012 passed by the Court of Motor accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur District Jaipur (for short 'the Tribunal') in Motor accident Claim Case No. 87/12 (816/2005), whereby an amount of Rs. 3,72,700/- has been awarded by way of compensation on account of death of anurag Meena in an accident occurred on 08.06.2004.

2. The Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence available on record and hearing counsel for the parties, decided the claim petition of the appellants-claimants awarding compensation to the tune of Rs.3,72,700/- under various heads in favour of the appellants-claimants.

3. The issue involved in this appeal is that- 'Whether a Bachelor aged 22 years, studying in 3rd year, Bachelor of Engineering would be treated as skilled labour/daily wager?'

4. Learned counsel for the appellants-claimants submits that the deceased at the time of accident was a Bachelor aged



      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top