ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Akash Mangal Son Of Rajendra Mangal – Appellant
Versus
Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, Jaipur Through Its Chancellor – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :
“a) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents may kindly be directed to issue the result of petitioner of the B.Sc. Part-IIIrd year (Hons.) course with agriculture First Semester examination and further the respondents may kindly be directed to allow to petitioner to attend regular classes of B.SC. Part-IIIrd year (Hons) Agriculture course;
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner, after passing Senior Secondary Examination, was granted admission in B.Sc. (Hons.) Course with the subject of Agriculture and he was allotted the College of Agriculture, Lalsot.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner passed all the semester of B.Sc. Part-I Year (Hons.) course with agriculture and appeared in B.Sc. Part-II Year (Hons.) course and was also declared successful in first semester examination of the aforesaid course.
4. Learned counsel submitted that the respondents conducted B.Sc. Part-II Year (Hons.) course and issued admission card to the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel submitted that meanwhile, the petitioner was also granted admi
Ashok Chand Singhvi Vs. University of Jodhpur & Ors. (AIR 1989 SC 823)
Point of Law : If candidate is not at fault then he is not supposed to suffer on account of mistake, committed by University Authorities, suffice it to say by this Court that the Apex Court in the sa....
A university cannot deny a student the right to continue studies or withhold examination results based on procedural failures, especially after allowing the student to attend classes and take exams.
The court emphasized the importance of considering a student's legitimate expectations and the impact of University rules on academic progression, especially in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Judicial review is limited in academic matters unless there is a clear violation of statutory provisions or regulations.
Court ruled that educational institutions must act fairly and acknowledge students' legitimate expectations, particularly after allowing them to participate in examinations despite procedural discrep....
Petitioners cannot claim academic progression without meeting regulatory requirements and clearing necessary subjects. Contempt of court claim dismissed due to compliance by respondents.
The court emphasized that the proposition that the University is precluded from holding back a result of a candidate if allowed to sit and participate in the examination is not of universal applicati....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.